Skip to content
Global South AI Safety Hackathon

Jun 19 - 21, 2026Online and in person

Global South AI Safety Hackathon

This Sprint has ended.

Sign-ups
1,547
Projects submitted
216
Browse the 216 projects

Sign up for this Sprint

Type N/A if you don’t have one.

Type N/A if you don’t have one.

What you work on, and whether you are open to new roles.

What about this event made you want to take part?

By signing up you agree to our Privacy Policy.

The submission window has closed. Your draft is still here so you can copy it, but it can no longer be submitted.

Submit your project

Project details

A short abstract: what you did, what you found.

PDF, up to 25 MB.

Are you interested in publishing this project? *
Tracks

Choose every track your project fits.

PDF, PowerPoint, Keynote or ODP, up to 25 MB.

PNG, JPEG, WebP or GIF, up to 25 MB.

Team details

Team member 1

Leave blank if you don’t have one.

By submitting you agree to the prize terms and our Privacy Policy.

The submission window has closed. Your draft is still here so you can copy it, but it can no longer be submitted.

See upcoming Sprints

AI safety research is concentrated in a handful of countries. This hackathon changes that. Build AI safety tools, evaluations, and policy research from Latin America, Africa, or Asia, compete within your region, and join a pipeline from hackathon to fellowship to placement. With Support from Schmidt Sciences.

Entries

Overview

HACKATHON WINNERS

Congratulations to our winning teams, and thank you to everyone who submitted. We received 217 projects across three tracks, from hubs and participants across Latin America, Africa, and Asia, with support from Schmidt Sciences. The bar was high throughout. Each regional winner receives $1,000.

🌎 Latin America

🥇 Coldron by Leonardo Párraga, Angie Giraldo & Víctor Gelves
🥇 Probing Latent Colombian Identity Inferences in Qwen2.5-7B with Natural Language Autoencoders by UAO SAFETY
🥇 Thought Anchors for Social Bias: Which Reasoning Steps Matter in Extended Thinking LLMs on Latin American Scenarios by Andres Felipe Mosquera Hernandez

🌏 Asia-Pacific

🥇 STEER: Mech interp-based white box attack on LLMs by Joshua Adrian Cahyono
🥇 Do Multilingual Vision-Language Models Abstain under Cross-Modal Conflict in Low-Resource Languages? by Anvesh Reddy Lankala, Vicky Feliren & Akansh Jain

🌍 Africa

🥇 Confidently Wrong: Measuring and Mitigating Calibration Risks in LLMs for African Languages by Team AIMS South Africa

🎖️ Honorable Mentions

Non-cash recognition for standout work, with these teams under consideration for the Apart Fellowship.
JusticIA
Pragmatic Sophistry in Vietnamese Multi-Agent Oversight
¿Por qué los agentes obedecen?
Local-Geometry Signals of Capability Emergence During Portuguese Grammar Acquisition
IndicViet-Safe
The Shapes of Bias in Spanish-Prompted LLMs and the Debiasing Prompt Scaffolds
Ufakazi

—————————————————————————————————————————————————

The Global South AI Safety Hackathon brings together researchers, engineers, and policy professionals across Latin America, Africa, and Asia to work on AI safety problems that matter most in their regions. Over one weekend, participants build tools, evaluations, and policy research addressing gaps the field has overlooked.

The hackathon is designed for and with the Global South. Participants compete within their region, not globally. The best teams from all regions are invited into the Apart Fellowship for continued research and mentorship.

Why the Global South?

AI safety research is concentrated in a handful of countries. None of the top 100 institutions by AI publication index, in either universities or companies, are based in Africa or Latin America (Chan et al., 2021). Meanwhile, AI risks hit differently in these regions: jailbreaks are more common in low-resource languages, and algorithmic bias trained on non-local data shows up in healthcare and hiring deployments.

This hackathon is not about bringing AI safety to the Global South. It is about bringing the Global South into AI safety. Researchers here have contextual knowledge the field needs: regulatory landscapes, language gaps, and institutional constraints that determine whether safety research actually works in practice.

Regional Tracks

Participants compete within their region. Each region has its own winners and prizes. Within each regional track, participants choose a sub-track (Technical AI Safety, AI Governance/Policy, or a locally-tailored sub-track defined by their hub). If you're based outside the three regions, you can still take part through the Open Track below.

Track 1: Latin America

Hubs in São Paulo, Buenos Aires, Bogotá, México: Merida-Guadalajara. Three winning teams ($3,000 total).

Brazil's AI bill (PL 2.338/2023), approved by the Senate and pending Chamber vote, includes a standalone human rights chapter that goes beyond the EU AI Act. Chile became the first country in the world to constitutionally protect neuro-rights. Colombia's CONPES 4144 established a national AI policy framework in early 2025.

We encourage submissions in three sub-tracks:

  • Technical safety: AI fairness for Portuguese and Spanish language models, safety evaluations for AI systems deployed in Latin American contexts.
  • Governance: regulatory analysis of emerging legislation across the region.
  • Locally-tailored: problems defined by your hub that reflect local context.
  • Open: any other project relevant to AI safety in the region that doesn't fit the categories above.

Track 2: Africa

Hub in Cape Town. One winning team ($1,000 total).

Africa faces risks from advanced AI that are not addressed through frontier AI safety efforts. African-context deployment-side risks include deepfake-driven electoral interference, data-colonial dependency on foreign infrastructure, compute and semiconductor scarcity constraining sovereign AI capacity, and large-scale labour market disruptions. This hackathon is an opportunity to prototype African-context solutions for misuse resilience, differential defence acceleration, and mitigating gradual disempowerment.

We encourage submissions in three sub-tracks:

  • Policy: recommendations grounded in African regulatory and institutional contexts.
  • Evals and benchmarks: work that builds on existing efforts and transfers to African contexts.
  • Open: any other project relevant to AI safety in the region that doesn't fit the categories above.

Track 3: Asia

Hubs in Bengaluru (Electric Sheep), New Delhi (Secure AI Futures Lab), and Vietnam (Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City). Two winning teams ($2,000 total).

Asia spans the full spectrum of AI governance approaches. India's "Seven Sutras" framework explicitly prioritizes innovation over restraint. China has enacted more sector-specific AI regulations than any other country. Vietnam's AI law took effect in March 2026, the first binding AI legislation in Southeast Asia. The ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics offers a voluntary regional framework. Projects can address cross-border governance harmonization, safety evaluations for non-English language models, technical AI safety research, or region-specific risk assessments.

We encourage submissions in three sub-tracks:

  • Governance and geopolitics: AI compliance, AI sovereignty, national data security, compute diffusion and access.
  • Socio-economic impacts: deepfakes and misinformation, caste bias, algorithmic bias across ethnic minorities, languages, and dialects, AI misdiagnosis in rural healthcare, gig platforms, labor displacement, gradual disempowerment, and cooperative AI.
  • Technical safety: cybersecurity, multilingual, multimodal, and open-source models, small AI, and on-device AI.
  • Open: any other project relevant to AI safety in the region that doesn't fit the categories above.

Track 4: Open

Based outside Latin America, Africa, and Asia? You can still take part. Submit your project to the Open Track and build the same way the regional tracks do: a tool, evaluation, or policy analysis on any AI safety problem that matters to you.

Who should participate?

  • Founders and entrepreneurs
  • AI safety researchers and engineers
  • Machine learning researchers and engineers
  • Policy researchers working on AI governance
  • Software engineers interested in safety infrastructure
  • Security researchers and red teamers
  • Students and early-career researchers exploring AI safety
  • Anyone working on AI and its impacts in the Global South

What you will do

Over three days, you will:

  1. Form teams and choose a regional track and sub-track
  2. Research and scope a specific problem using the provided resources
  3. Build a project: a tool, evaluation, policy analysis, or research contribution
  4. Submit a research report (PDF) documenting your approach, results, and implications
  5. Have your work reviewed by judges from AI safety organizations, universities, and policy institutions in your region

What happens next

After the hackathon, all submitted projects are reviewed by expert judges. Top projects receive prizes. The best teams may be invited into the Apart Fellowship for continued research and mentorship (subject to the asterisked caveat in Overview).

Organized by

Apart Research

Local hubs (8):

  • Latin America: BAISH (Buenos Aires) | EA Brasil (São Paulo) | AI Safety Colombia (Bogotá) | AISMX (Mérida and Guadalajara)
  • Africa: AI Safety South Africa (Cape Town)
  • Asia: Electric Sheep (Bengaluru) | Secure AI Futures Lab (New Delhi) | AnToàn.AI (Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City)

Supported by Schmidt Sciences.

Resources

Curated reading, tools, and project ideas. Start with Readings for All Tracks, then open your region. Each region lists suggested sub-tracks, reading, example projects, and local hubs. Shared tools and evaluation frameworks are at the bottom. You compete within your region; sub-tracks are guidance, not gates.

Project Ideas for all Tracks

Build with Adaption

Adaption builds adaptive AI infrastructure that lets researchers and builders train frontier models in days, not months. AutoScientist automates the full AI research and training loop, co-optimizing data and model recipes end-to-end until your model converges on your objective. Adaption supports 242 languages, making it one of the most linguistically inclusive AI platforms in the world. Participants can use AutoScientist directly to train and release their models and Adaptive Data to expand their datasets. 300 Adaption platform credits are included to get started.

Learn more about AutoScientist
Explore Adaptive Data
For questions you can join the Adaption Discord

Readings for All Tracks

AI Safety Foundations

AI Safety and the Global South

AI Governance and Middle Powers

Multilingual Safety and Evaluation (all regions)

Latin America

Hubs in Sao Paulo, Buenos Aires, Bogota, Merida, and Guadalajara. Three winning teams ($3,000 total). Brazil's AI bill (PL 2.338/2023) includes a standalone human rights chapter that goes beyond the EU AI Act. Chile became the first country to constitutionally protect neuro-rights. Colombia's CONPES 4144 established a national AI policy framework in early 2025.

Sub-track suggestions

  • Technical AI safety: evaluations for agentic systems, mechanistic interpretability, AI fairness for Portuguese and Spanish language models.
  • AI security: pipeline security (API, cloud), prompt injection and jailbreaks, AI control.
  • Responsible AI: hallucination mitigation, behavioral audit, social impact evaluation.
  • AI governance: AI policy and regulation analysis, system auditing and accountability, ecosystem monitoring, lethal autonomous weapons governance.
  • Open: any other project relevant to AI safety in the region.

Reading

Local hubs

  • BAISH - Buenos Aires AI Safety Hub. Workshops, courses, scholarships.
  • AISMX - AI Safety Mexico (Merida and Guadalajara).
  • AI Safety Brazil - Brazil's AI safety community (Sao Paulo).
  • Indice Latinoamericano de IA - Annual Latin American AI index covering infrastructure, R&D, and governance.

Africa

The global AI safety movement has focused on constraining frontier development in the US and China, leaving the deployment-side risks that affect Africa largely unaddressed. African countries face a distinctive risk profile: deepfake-driven electoral interference, data-colonial dependency on foreign infrastructure, compute and semiconductor scarcity, and large-scale labour market disruptions. Hub in Cape Town. One winning team ($1,000 total).

Sub-track suggestions

  • Policy: comparative analysis of how African nations' draft AI policies address specific harms, with implementation-grounded recommendations.
  • Evaluation and benchmarking: build on existing test suites or prototype new evals that transfer to African-context risks.
  • Monitoring and tooling: prototypes for surfacing harms not currently captured, such as community-level monitoring.
  • Open: any other project relevant to AI safety in the region.

Reading

Risk taxonomy and African AI safety agenda

Disinformation and electoral integrity

Policy and governance documents

  • African Union Continental AI Strategy (2024) - The continental framework endorsed by the AU Executive Council; baseline for comparative African policy analysis.
  • "The New Empire of AI: The Future of Global Inequality" (Rachel Adams, Polity Press, 2024) - How AI reshapes power between states, corporations, and Global South communities.

African-language NLP benchmarks

  • "AfriSenti" (Muhammad et al., 2023) - 110,000+ tweets across 14 African languages annotated for sentiment.
  • "IrokoBench" (Adelani et al., 2024) - Human-translated benchmark for 17 low-resource African languages (includes AfriMMLU).
  • "AfroBench" (Ahuja et al., 2023) - 15 tasks, 22 datasets, 64 languages. The broadest map of what exists and what is missing.

AI safety evaluation for African languages

Red-teaming and participatory harm monitoring

Broader evaluation methodology

Institutions Doing Ongoing Work

  • UCT African Hub on AI Safety, Peace and Security
  • Global Centre on AI Governance
  • Tech Governance Project
  • CIPESA
  • The Collective Intelligence Project, especially their weval work.

Resources

Asia

The world's most dynamic region is also its most exposed. Asia holds half the world's people, most of its informal workers, and its sharpest geopolitical fault lines. Asia spans the full spectrum of AI governance approaches. India's "Seven Sutras" framework prioritizes innovation over restraint. Vietnam's AI law took effect in March 2026, the first binding AI legislation in Southeast Asia. The ASEAN Guide on AI Governance and Ethics offers a voluntary regional framework. Hubs in Bengaluru (Electric Sheep), New Delhi (Secure AI Futures Lab), and Vietnam (Hanoi and Ho Chi Minh City). Two winning teams ($2,000 total)

Sub-track suggestions

  • Governance and geopolitics: AI compliance, AI sovereignty, national data security, compute diffusion and access.
  • Socio-economic impacts: deepfakes and misinformation, caste bias, algorithmic bias across ethnic minorities, languages, and dialects, AI misdiagnosis in rural healthcare, gig platforms, labor displacement, gradual disempowerment, and cooperative AI.
  • Technical safety: cybersecurity, multilingual, multimodal, and open-source models, small AI, and edge AI.
  • Open: any other project relevant to AI safety in the region.

Reading

Governance and geopolitics: AI sovereignty, compute, and access

Socio-economic impacts: labor, gradual disempowerment, cooperative AI

Technical safety: cybersecurity, multimodal and open models, small and edge AI

Asia as the most dynamic and most exposed region

India-specific: deepfakes, caste bias, rural health, and the AI Safety Institute

Vietnam-specific: the Law on AI and national strategy

Local hubs

Shared Tools and Evaluation Frameworks

Safety evaluation

  • DeepSafe Toolkit (AI45Lab) - Integrates 20+ safety benchmarks with a YAML-driven pipeline.
  • Promptfoo - Open-source LLM evaluation with built-in multilingual jailbreak testing.
  • LightEval (Hugging Face) - Lightweight, configurable LLM evaluation toolkit.
  • PolyGuard (COLM 2025) - Multilingual safety classifier for 17 languages.
  • SALAD-Bench (Shanghai AI Lab) - Hierarchical safety benchmark with native Chinese-language coverage.
  • ControlArena (UK AISI / Redwood) - AI control evaluation framework for agent safety scenarios.

Governance trackers and bias auditing

Guidelines

Judging Criteria

Dimension 1: Impact Potential & Innovation

How much would this matter for AI safety if it worked? How innovative is it?
For scores of 4-5: is this actually new to the field, or replicating recent work?

ScoreDescription
1Negligible. No clear problem addressed, or no meaningful novelty.
2Limited. Addresses a real problem but with a generic or well-trodden approach. Incremental at best.
3Moderate. Clear problem with a reasonable approach; some novelty in framing or method beyond routine application of existing tools.
4Significant. Important problem with an original approach, or identifies a neglected problem area. A valuable contribution others could build on.
5Exceptional. Tackles a critical AI safety problem with a genuinely novel approach, or opens a new research direction. Clear theory of change. You'd be excited to share this with researchers in the area.

Dimension 2: Execution Quality

How sound are methodology, implementation, and findings?

ScoreDescription
1Seriously flawed. Methodology broken, results uninterpretable, or implementation doesn't work.
2Weak. Approach has significant gaps: missing validation, flawed experimental design, or incomplete implementation.
3Competent. Technically solid given the short duration. Methodology makes sense, results are interpretable, limitations acknowledged, work builds toward clear conclusions.
4Strong. Thorough methodology with convincing validation. Results clearly support conclusions. Immediately useful for future work.
5Exceptional. Ambitious scope executed rigorously. Surprising findings, novel methods, or unusually robust validation.

Dimension 3: Presentation & Clarity

How clearly are work, findings, and impact potential communicated?

ScoreDescription
1Incomprehensible. Cannot determine what the project is actually claiming or doing.
2Hard to follow. Key information buried, missing, or diluted by excessive length. Significant effort to extract main points.
3Clear enough. Can understand the problem, approach, and results without undue effort. Core content clearly present: problem, method, findings, limitations.
4Well presented. Easy to follow, well-structured, appropriate level of detail. Target audience would get it quickly.
5Exceptionally clear. A pleasure to read. Complex ideas made accessible. Could serve as a model for how to present this type of work.

Submission Requirements

A complete submission includes:

  1. A research report in PDF format using the official submission template
  2. A project title and brief abstract (150 words max)
  3. Author names and affiliations for all team members
  4. An indication of which regional track and sub-track your project addresses

Important: Include a section called "Limitations and Dual-Use Considerations" that addresses limitations of your approach, potential misuse risks, and suggestions for future improvements.

There is no hard page limit. Most winning projects are 4-8 pages. The report should include:

  • Introduction: What problem did you address? Why does it matter for AI safety in your region or globally?
  • Related Work: What existing work does your project build on?
  • Methodology: What did you build or test? Describe your approach in enough detail for someone to replicate it
  • Results: What did you find? Include quantitative results where possible
  • Discussion: What are the implications? What are the limitations? What would you do with more time?
  • References: Cite relevant prior work
  • Do not submit the whole report in Italic

Important notes:

  • You can submit as an individual or as a team
  • You can build on existing work, but you MUST clearly identify what is NEW work done during the hackathon
  • Submit through the official submission form on the hackathon page
  • If you run into submission issues, DM Kamil on Discord or email sprints@apartresearch.com
  • Have team names, emails, Discord handles, project title, abstract, and PDF ready before starting the form.
  • Reports can be in English, Spanish, or Portuguese. English is preferred if your team is comfortable with it, but we will not penalize non-English submissions.
  • Due to the high volume of submissions, we may not be able to provide written feedback for every project, but all projects will be evaluated.

Frequently Asked Questions

Eligibility and Format

Q: Do I have to be from the Global South to participate?
We use Britannica's definition of the Global South. If you're based in Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, or Asia/Oceania (excluding Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, New Zealand), you're in scope.

If you're based outside these regions, you're still welcome: submit your project to the Open Track (Track 4). If you're not sure where you fit, sign up and we'll sort it out.

Q: Do I need a research background or coding experience to participate?
No formal requirement. Past sprints have had grad students, undergrads, industry engineers, and self-taught researchers all submit winning projects. What helps: ability to scope a small experiment, write up findings clearly in a short PDF. We provide resources, mentor support during the weekend, and the rubric publicly so you know what's being evaluated. If you're unsure whether you'd fit, ask in the Frequently Asked Questions

Answers below are from the Apart master FAQ database (Kamil-approved). For anything not covered, ask on Discord help-desk or email sprints@apartresearch.com.

Eligibility and Format

Q: Do I have to be from the Global South to participate?
We use Britannica's definition of the Global South. If you're based in Latin America, Africa, the Middle East, or Asia/Oceania (excluding Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, Australia, New Zealand), you're in scope. If you're not sure, sign up and we'll sort it out.

Q: Do I need a research background or coding experience to participate?
No formal requirement. Past sprints have had grad students, undergrads, industry engineers, and self-taught researchers all submit winning projects. What helps: ability to scope a small experiment, write up findings clearly in a short PDF. We provide resources, mentor support during the weekend, and the rubric publicly so you know what's being evaluated. If you're unsure whether you'd fit, ask in the Discord help-desk.

Q: Is the hackathon remote or in-person? Can I attend remotely if there's a local hub in my city?
Default is remote. We also have local in-person hubs where people optionally gather for the weekend. You can join remotely from anywhere even if there's a hub in your city. Hubs are optional and additive, not a separate event. Talks are livestreamed to remote participants; judging is always asynchronous and online.

Q: When is the hackathon?
June 19-21, 2026. It starts Friday evening. Submissions close Sunday June 21 at 11:59 PM AoE (Anywhere on Earth).

Teams and Tracks

Q: Can I participate solo, or is it teams only? What's the max team size?
Both solo and team submissions are welcome. Maximum team size is 5. Smaller teams (1-3) are common and have won prizes. If you're solo and want a team, post in the Discord #team-formation channel a week or two before the event. We don't auto-match teams; it's organic.

Q: How strict are you on the tracks? Can my project fit between two or none of them?
Tracks are guidance, not gates. If your project genuinely lives between two tracks, pick the closest one and explain the cross-track angle in your submission. Judges score on Impact, Execution, and Presentation across all tracks; nobody gets disqualified for fit. If it really fits none of the tracks but is in scope for the hackathon's overall topic, submit anyway and Kamil will route it. Better to submit and have us re-bin than to skip.

Q: Can a team have members from different regions?
Yes. Choose the regional track that best fits your project. Your team can include members from any location. You compete for prizes in whichever regional track you select.

Submissions

Q: What do I submit?
A research report in PDF format using the submission template. Think of it as a mini research paper documenting your problem, approach, results, and implications. Not a product demo.

Q: Can I build on existing work, or does everything have to be from scratch during the hackathon?
Yes, you can build on existing work, as long as the contribution you make during the hackathon is clearly identifiable in your submission. Judges look for what's new this round. Cite prior work in your PDF (anywhere from a sentence to a methods paragraph; whatever makes the delta clear). The Project Eligibility note in our rubric covers this. Submissions that don't show a clear during-event delta tend to score lower on Execution.

Q: Do you recommend a particular referencing/citation style for the project write-up?
No required style. Pick whichever you are comfortable with (APA, MLA, Chicago, IEEE, etc.) and stay consistent throughout the paper. The judges care about the substance of the work, not the citation format.

Q: Can I submit an unfinished project?
Yes. Submitting something unfinished is always better than not submitting. Judges evaluate what you accomplished during the hackathon timeframe.

Judging, Results, and Prizes

Q: When are winners announced after the hackathon ends?
Roughly 1-3 weeks after the event. The timeline: judges receive assignments Monday or Tuesday after the weekend, reviews are due the following Sunday, then we tally and rank, then we send winner notifications. For biosecurity-related events we add a hazard review step before announcing publicly, which can extend the timeline. We send everyone reviewer feedback after winners are notified.

Q: How are prizes awarded?
Prizes are awarded per region, not globally. Latin America has 3 winning teams, Asia has 2, and Africa has 1. You compete with participants in your regional track.

Q: How and when do prize payments arrive after the hackathon?
Winners are announced 1-3 weeks after the event. After announcement, your team agrees on a prize split and nominates one person to receive the funds. That nominee fills out a payment form and is onboarded to our payment processor (Ashgro/Ramp). Payment lands roughly 2-4 weeks after the form is submitted, depending on the payout method. The nominee handles distribution to the rest of the team. International transfers may take longer.

Support

Q: How do I get help during the hackathon?
Three ways:

Schedule

Wednesday June 17
23:00 UTCMiguel A. Peñaloza, Statistician, LLM evaluation researcherRecording
Thursday June 18
02:00 UTCValerie Pang, Program Manager, Singapore AI Safety HubRecording
11:15 UTCTianyi Qiu, Alignment researcher, Oxford HAI / Stanford CSRecording
13:30 UTCAkash Kundu, Cooperative AI Research FellowRecording
14:30 UTCCarlos Giudice, Research Engineer, EquiStampRecording
16:00 UTCJames Fox, Senior Science Associate, Schmidt SciencesRecording
17:00 UTCSrinivas Pochincharla, Senior Technical Program Manager, AmazonRecording
18:00 UTCSamuel Segun, CEO, Quelox LabsRecording
Friday June 19
12:00 UTCClement Neo, Founder, Neo ResearchRecording
13:00 UTCHieu Vu, language-model interpretability researcherRecording
15:00 UTCNaveen Kumar Gond, BASIS (UC Berkeley)Recording
16:30 UTCSang Truong, PhD candidate, Stanford AI LabRecording
17:30 UTCRoshni Lulla, Co-founder & CRO, Institute for Humane RoboticsRecording
18:30 UTCJasmine Li, Research Scientist, SaferAIRecording
20:00 UTCPradyumna Shyama Prasad, Evaluations Fellow, ElicitRecording
Saturday June 20
00:00 UTCSissi de la Peña, Founder, The Dot NetworkRecording
01:00 UTCTan Zhi Xuan, Presidential Young Professor, NUS Computer ScienceRecording
14:00 UTCJanhavi Khindkar, Bhashini; and leads ValueShift ResearchRecording
17:00 UTCHemanth Badabagni, Senior Forward Deploy Engineer at DatabricksRecording
18:00 UTCJuan Roberto Hernández Villalobos, AI Consultant, UNESCORecording
Sunday June 21
01:00 UTCAmaia Amezaga, Founder, Sattva LabsRecording
18:00 UTCIsabella Rodrigues Martins, Cybersecurity professionalRecording
20:00 UTCJuan Felipe Cerón Uribe, AI Alignment Research Engineer, OpenAIRecording
Logistics Presentation + QARecording
Submission Deadline is Sunday End of Day Anywhere on Earth

More Talks are being scheduled

Speakers

  • James Fox

    James Fox

    Speaker

    James Fox is a Senior Science Associate at Schmidt Sciences, where he leads the Science of Trustworthy AI program and supports the broader mission of the AI and Advanced Computing Institute. Prior to joining Schmidt Sciences, James served as Research Director of the London Initiative for Safe AI (LISA). He earned his DPhil in Computer Science from the University of Oxford, supervised by Tom Everitt, Michael Wooldridge & Alessandro Abate; research on game theory, causality, and reinforcement learning. MSci/BA Natural Sciences (Physics), Cambridge.

  • Juan Felipe Cerón Uribe

    Juan Felipe Cerón Uribe

    Speaker and Judge

    Juan Felipe Cerón Uribe is an AI Alignment Research Engineer at OpenAI in San Francisco, where he works on mitigating existential risks from artificial intelligence. He previously built AI systems at Factored and was a research intern at the Stanford Existential Risks Initiative.

  • Tan Zhi Xuan

    Tan Zhi Xuan

    Speaker

    Tan Zhi Xuan is a Presidential Young Professor in the NUS Department of Computer Science. Xuan's research focuses on scaling cooperative intelligence via rational and model-based AI, spanning probabilistic programming, model-based planning, Bayesian inference, AI alignment, and computational cognitive science, and leads the Cooperative Systems & Intelligence (CoSI) lab.

  • Samuel Segun

    Samuel Segun

    Speaker and Judge

    Dr. Samuel T. Segun is an expert in AI safety, ethics and technical governance, advising governments, multilateral institutions, and research networks on responsible AI. He is an Honorary Senior Lecturer and a Senior Research member of the African Hub on AI Safety, Peace and Security at the University of Cape Town, Editor-in-Chief of The Algorithmic Review, and sits on the Board of Advisors for VerifyWise. Previously he was Senior Consultant on AI Safety to the UN Office of Counter-Terrorism (UNOCT) and UNICRI. He is the author/editor of several articles and books (Palgrave, Nature, Springer, Cambridge), including Selected Issues in the Ethics of AI (2022) and AI, Ethics and Policy Governance in Africa (2024).

  • Umut Pajaro Velasquez

    Umut Pajaro Velasquez

    Speaker and Judge

    Umut Pajaro Velasquez is President of the Internet Society Colombia Chapter and holds an MA in Cultural Studies, researching education, digital rights, and ethical AI design and development, with a focus on mitigating bias against marginalized groups. Umut has chaired Internet Governance groups, including the Internet Society Gender Standing Group.

  • Sang Truong

    Sang Truong

    Speaker

    Sang Truong develops foundations for AI Measurement Science, drawing on probabilistic machine learning, measurement theory, and mechanism design to improve how we evaluate AI systems. His work supports the development of AI systems that serve people across diverse backgrounds and needs. He is a PhD candidate in Computer Science at the Stanford AI Lab with Sanmi Koyejo and Nick Haber.

Show 19 moreShow fewer
  • Tianyi Qiu

    Tianyi Qiu

    Speaker and Judge

    Tianyi is an alignment researcher at Oxford HAI / Stanford CS and former Anthropic AI Safety Fellow. He develops human-in-the-loop training interventions that make AI foster, not undermine, growth in human ideas. Research projects he led have received two Best Paper Awards (ACL'25; NeurIPS'24 Pluralistic Alignment Workshop).

  • Akash Kundu

    Akash Kundu

    Speaker

    Akash Kundu is an AI safety researcher from Kolkata with publications at NeurIPS and ICLR. He has worked with organisations including FAR.AI and Apart Research (as a lab fellow) on AI safety and LLM evaluation, and is currently in the extension phase of the Cooperative AI Research Fellowship.

  • Amaia Amézaga

    Amaia Amézaga

    Speaker and Judge

    Amaia Amézaga is an independent researcher and the founder of Sattva Labs, an initiative dedicated to AI safety, model evaluation, and human-AI interaction. Her approach combines interaction design (HCI), multicultural and multilingual communication, and qualitative analysis to explore how people interpret, use, and relate to artificial intelligence systems.

  • Carlos Giudice

    Carlos Giudice

    Speaker

    Carlos Giudice is a research engineer at EquiStamp, contracting for Redwood Research on AI control, where he helped build LinuxArena. Before AI safety he spent six years as an ML engineer at MercadoLibre (Latin America's largest e-commerce company) and a year at CERN simulating data-transfer networks. He co-organizes BAISH, the Buenos Aires AI Safety Hub.

  • Clement Neo

    Clement Neo

    Speaker

    Clement Neo works on mechanistic interpretability for AI safety. He is a Lab Advisor at Apart Research and the founder of Neo Research, and was previously a research engineer at the Singapore AI Safety Institute and Nanyang Technological University.

  • Hieu Vu

    Hieu Vu

    Speaker and Judge

    An engineer turned independent researcher studying the interpretability of language models.

  • Jasmine Li

    Jasmine Li

    Speaker and Judge

    Jasmine is a research scientist at SaferAI and former MATS fellow. She previously worked on evaluation gaming mitigations as a MATS Fellow with Alex Turner, agent security at Gray Swan AI, and LLM honesty with the Center for AI Safety.

  • Luis Enrique Urtubey De Césaris

    Luis Enrique Urtubey De Césaris

    Speaker and Judge

    Luis Enrique Urtubey De Césaris is Director of Strategy at CEGIA, the Centro de Estudos em Governança de Inteligência Artificial, where he leads work on AI governance and field-building. His current focus areas include PL 2338/2023, Brazil's framework AI bill; the creation of a Brazilian AI Safety Institute; international AI governance coordination; and capacity-building in AI governance and technical AI safety.

  • Miguel A. Peñaloza

    Miguel A. Peñaloza

    Speaker

    Miguel A. Peñaloza is a professional statistician whose work focuses on developing benchmarks to assess the capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs). Currently, he is designing methodologies aimed at making AI system evaluations more inclusive, representative, and globally accessible.

  • Naveen Kumar Gond

    Naveen Kumar Gond

    Speaker

    Naveen Kumar Gond is an alumnus of the BASIS AI Safety Policy Fellowship at UC Berkeley with a background in public policy and governance. His focus is on global AI governance and frontier AI risk, particularly how international institutions and national regulators can develop coherent frameworks for advanced AI systems. He is currently building his research and policy practice at the intersection of AI alignment, responsible AI development, and regulatory affairs.

  • Pradyumna Shyama Prasad

    Pradyumna Shyama Prasad

    Speaker

    Pradyumna Shyama Prasad is an Evaluations Fellow at Elicit, where he works on AI evaluations.

  • Roshni Lulla

    Roshni Lulla

    Speaker

    Roshni is co-founder and CRO of the Institute for Humane Robotics (IHR), working on guidelines for human-robot interactions, and a neuroscientist (PhD, Brain & Cognitive Sciences, USC, under Antonio Damasio and Jonas Kaplan). Bridges affective neuroscience, moral cognition, and AI safety.

  • Sissi de la Peña

    Sissi de la Peña

    Speaker

    Sissi de la Peña is the Director of The Dot Network and served as a 2024-2025 Tech Policy Fellow at UC Berkeley. She has spent over 20 years in Latin American digital and AI policy, from USMCA digital-trade negotiations to representing major technology companies in regional regulatory forums, and was named Responsible AI Leader of the Year at the 2025 Women in AI Awards.

  • Srinivas Pochincharla

    Srinivas Pochincharla

    Speaker and Judge

    Srinivas Pochincharla is an engineering leader and Senior Technical Program Manager at Amazon with over 12 years of experience in software engineering, enterprise data architecture, and AI/ML-powered product development. He specializes in leading complex, cross-functional initiatives at the intersection of large-scale data platforms and intelligent automation, with a particular focus on Generative AI and enterprise data transformation.

  • Valerie Pang

    Valerie Pang

    Speaker

    Valerie is the Program Manager at Singapore AI Safety Hub where she handles memberships, marketing, events and operations. She has 4 years of experience working in tech companies in the US and Singapore, and 2 years of international non-profit experience working in corporate engagement. She has experience organising events and conferences with hundreds of attendees.

  • Juan Roberto Hernández Villalobos

    Juan Roberto Hernández Villalobos

    Speaker

    Juan is an AI consultant for UNESCO. His work spans technology management and communication, with 15 years of experience in innovation, digital transformation, and AI, all with a focus on social impact and human rights.

  • Janhavi Khindkar

    Janhavi Khindkar

    Speaker, Judge and Mentor

    Janhavi Khindkar is an Applied AI Researcher and Engineer working on Bhashini, India's national multilingual AI platform under MeitY, where she works on model optimization, fine-tuning, and deployment for low-resource Indic languages at scale. She also leads ValueShift Research, an independent AI safety collaboration focused on mechanistic interpretability and AI control. Her work sits at the intersection of applied ML infrastructure and AI safety, with a particular interest in how safety alignment behaves across languages and cultural contexts.

  • Hemanth Badabagni

    Hemanth Badabagni

    Speaker and Judge

    Hemanth Badabagni is a technology leader specializing in data engineering, analytics, and AI-enabled data platforms. His work focuses on data governance, semantic systems, and enterprise AI, with an emphasis on building trusted, scalable foundations for data-driven decision-making.

  • Isabela Rodrigues Martins

    Isabela Rodrigues Martins

    Speaker

    Isabela is a cybersecurity professional with four years of experience focused on protecting data and systems. She continues to build her skills through specialized training, including AWS, the Microsoft SC-900 certification (via Womcy LATAM in partnership with Microsoft), and Harvard's CS50 Introduction to Computer Science (offered in Brazil through Fundacao Estudar), which covered JavaScript, Python, CSS, and HTML.

Judges and mentors

Show 76 moreShow fewer

Organizers

  • Kamil Alaa

    Organizer

    (opens in new tab)
  • Ivan Martucci Franco

    Hub Organizer EA Brazil

  • Tegan Green

    Hub Organizer AIS South Africa

    (opens in new tab)
  • Nguyen Tran

    Hub Organizer AnToàn.AI and Judge

  • Jose Gelves

    Hub Organizer AIS Colombia

  • Max Pinelo

    Hub Organizer AIS Mexico and Mentor

  • Isabel Camara

    Hub Organizer AIS Mexico

  • Janeth Valdivia

    Hub Organizer AIS Mexico

  • Angel Tenorio

    Hub Organizer AIS Mexico and Mentor

  • Marco Guzman

    Hub Organizer AIS Mexico

  • Dexter Gomez

    Hub Organizer AIS Mexico

  • Basil Labib

    Hub Organizer SAFL

Show 2 moreShow fewer
  • Ash Singh

    Hub Organizer Electric Sheep

  • Diksha Singh

    Hub Organizer Electric Sheep

Local sites

  • Apart Global South AI Safety Hackathon — México

    A collaborative space connecting students, researchers, engineers, policymakers, industry professionals, and academic communities across Mexico with the global AI safety ecosystem. Participants will collaborate on technical and governance projects addressing the challenges and opportunities of AI safety in the Global South. Mexico will host two in-person hubs in Mérida and Guadalajara, while participants from across the country are also welcome to join remotely. Join us!

    Event page: Apart Global South AI Safety Hackathon — México (opens in new tab)
  • Apart Global South AI Safety Hackathon — Santa Cruz Hub

    Local hub for the Apart Research Global South AI Safety Hackathon (June 19–21, 2026). A collaborative workspace connecting Bolivian researchers, engineers, and students with the global AI safety community. We will stream Apart's keynotes and mentorship sessions while working on technical and governance projects in teams.

    Event page: Apart Global South AI Safety Hackathon — Santa Cruz Hub (opens in new tab)
  • Global South AI Safety Hackathon — Bogotá Hub

    Local Bogotá hub for the Global South AI Safety Hackathon, coordinated by AI Safety Colombia. Participants will work in teams on technical AI safety, AI security, and responsible AI/governance projects connected to Latin American contexts, with access to talks, mentorship, and the broader Apart Research sprint.

    Event page: Global South AI Safety Hackathon — Bogotá Hub (opens in new tab)
  • Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Apart x AI Safety Zimbabwe

    The Global South AI Safety Hackathon (African track) brings together researchers, students and builders in Harare to develop evaluations, policy and tools for African AI risk contexts, hosted by AI Safety Zimbabwe, EA Zimbabwe and the AI Collective. Exact venue shared with registered participants.

    Event page: Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Apart x AI Safety Zimbabwe (opens in new tab)
  • Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Buenos Aires

    Sumate al nodo en Buenos Aires de la hackathon del sur global, organizado por BAISH (https://baish.com.ar/).

    Event page: Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Buenos Aires (opens in new tab)
  • Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Cape Town

    Develop context appropriate solutions to policy and evaluations for the African AI risk response, focussing on policy or technical interventions against the AI harms most likely to manifest in African deployment contexts.

    Event page: Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Cape Town (opens in new tab)
  • Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Da Nang

    AnToàn.AI (AI Safety Vietnam) is hosting the Da Nang jam site for the Global South Al Safety Hackathon. We will provide coworking spaces & refreshments on-site on June 20 and 21 for participants, along with streaming Apart's keynote and mentorship sessions.

    Event page: Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Da Nang (opens in new tab)
  • Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Dodoma Hub (CAIMSA)

    🚀 Global South AI Safety Challenge 2026 – Dodoma Hub(CAIMSA) 📍 Dodoma, Tanzania 📅 June 19–21, 2026 Join an international AI Safety and Governance research hackathon organized by Apart Research and hosted by CAIMSA (Centre for Artificial Intelligence and Multidiscipline Solutions in Africa). Work with interdisciplinary teams, receive mentorship from global experts, and contribute to research on safe, responsible, and inclusive AI. 🏆 Winning Team Prize: USD 1,000 🌍 Connect with participants across Africa, Asia, and Latin America 💡 No prior AI Safety experience required CAIMSA will provide venue, internet access, and collaborative workspace. Students, researchers, developers, policymakers, entrepreneurs, and innovators are all welcome. 📍 Venue: Tanzania Community Network Polytechnic College (TCNPC), Near Nzuguni B Primary School, Dodoma Register now and help shape the future of AI from the Global South. #AISafety #AIGovernance #GlobalSouth #CAIMSA #ApartResearch #Dodoma #Tanzania #ResponsibleAI

    Event page: Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Dodoma Hub (CAIMSA) (opens in new tab)
  • Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Florianópolis

    A 3-day coliving immersion and deep-work sprint to build AI safety tools for the Global South hackathon. Hosted at Rosemary Dream in Barra da Lagoa, Florianópolis, offering an in-person retreat surrounded by nature for next-gen builders and researchers.

    Event page: Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Florianópolis (opens in new tab)
  • Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Hanoi

    AnToàn.AI (AI Safety Vietnam) is hosting the Hanoi jam site for the Global South Al Safety Hackathon. We will provide coworking spaces & refreshments on-site on June 20 and 21 for participants, along with streaming Apart's keynote and mentorship sessions.

    Event page: Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Hanoi (opens in new tab)
  • Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Ho Chi Minh City

    AnToàn.AI (AI Safety Vietnam) is hosting the Ho Chi Minh City jam site for the Global South Al Safety Hackathon. We will provide coworking spaces & refreshments on-site on June 20 and 21 for participants, along with streaming Apart's keynote and mentorship sessions.

    Event page: Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Ho Chi Minh City (opens in new tab)
  • Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Joburg

    Join the Johannesburg hub for the Apart Global South AIS Hackathon! Develop context appropriate solutions to policy and evaluations for the African AI risk response, focussing on policy or technical interventions against the AI harms most likely to manifest in African deployment contexts. - Find collaborators to work on real research ideas - Get feedback from experts - Stand a chance to win $1000

    Event page: Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Joburg (opens in new tab)
  • Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Lusaka

    AI Saftey Zambia will facilitate the Lusaka Jam Site for the Global South AI Safety Sprint, which will bring together researchers, developers, creatives, students, and policy thinkers from across the country to participate in the sprint through collaborative virtual sessions on June 19 and 21, alongside an IRL co-working gathering on June 20 at the Library Shhhh Café, University of Zambia, Lusaka.

    Event page: Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Lusaka (opens in new tab)
  • Global South AI Safety Hackathon: New Delhi

    We are hosting the on-site Global South AI Safety hackathon in collaboration with Apart Research on June 20th 2026 in New Delhi, India. Join us for a day of building, finding your community, and winning exciting prizes!

    Event page: Global South AI Safety Hackathon: New Delhi (opens in new tab)
  • Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Slessor Lab

    This hackathon is a 48 + hours collaborative build with 2+ simultaneous chapters across 4+ continents. It is hosted by Apart Research in partnership with Abelar | Slessor Lab, and AI Safety SA to prototype contextual solutions. Spend the weekend testing ideas for misuse resilience, differential defense acceleration, and mitigating gradual disempowerment. This could take the form of: Policy recommendations. Evals and benchmarks that build on existing work and transfer to African contexts. Monitoring and tooling for capturing harms that are not yet at the foreground of AI safety. Open: any other project relevant to AI safety in the region that doesn't fit the categories above. Who should participate? All race, color, and gender. We’re promoting a collaborative approach between both developing and developed world, where knowledge sharing and technical transfers thrive. No cross-domain experience required. Deep expertise in your own track is enough. What you will do? Over 48+ hours, you will form a team, choose a track, and contribute working code, documentation, or research to a repository. At the end of the event, teams present their contributions to judges and mentors from across the AI safety ecosystem. What happens next? All submitted work will be reviewed by expert judges. Top contributions have price rewards. They’ll be invited for fellowship programs by Apart Research

    Event page: Global South AI Safety Hackathon: Slessor Lab (opens in new tab)
  • Global South AIS Hackathon: Bengaluru

    Bengaluru, one of the jam sites for the Global South AI Safety Sprint, is hosting the AI Safety Hackathon from 19–21 June. Connect with brilliant minds, collaborate on impactful ideas, and get a chance to win prizes while engaging with people working in the AI safety space. Join us either in person or online.

    Event page: Global South AIS Hackathon: Bengaluru (opens in new tab)
  • Hackathon - Segurança de IA do Sul Global | Hub São Paulo

    O Hackathon de IA para o Sul Global, organizado pela Apart Research e colaboradores da América Latina, África e Ásia, tem como objetivo promover e incentivar a participação na criação de soluções práticas de segurança em IA para o Sul Global.

    Event page: Hackathon - Segurança de IA do Sul Global | Hub São Paulo (opens in new tab)

Where a Sprint can lead

How our programs connect
  1. Sprint

    Anyone can join

    Stand out

  2. Apart Fellowship

    6 to 16 weeks on your own project, with a research project manager, compute and publication support.